The following descriptions in notices have been found not to satisfy article 39 (1) because they were insufficiently specific: notice that stones for the facade of a building were mislabelled, that some stones and sills were not the proper size, and that the glue provided for mounting the stones was defective, where the notice failed to specify which specific items were unlabelled, the quantity and specific items that were of the wrong size, and the exact quantity of stones treated with the defective glue; notice that flowering plants were in miserable condition and suffered from poor growth (the court noted that the latter might refer to either the size or the appearance of the plants); notice that cotton cloth was of bad quality; notice that furniture had wrong parts and much breakage; notice of poor workmanship and improper fitting as to fashion goods; notice that failed to specify that cheese was infested with maggots; notice that the quality of fabric was objectionable and the dimensions of the delivered cloth prevented it from being cut in an economical fashion, where the notice failed to specify the nature of the quality problems and failed to indicate what dimensions would permit economical cutting; notice that agricultural machinery failed to function properly but that did not specify the serial number or the delivery date of the machine; notice that truffles had softened when they in fact contained worms, even though most professional sellers would understand that softness implied worms; notice that shoes were not of the quality required by the contract, but which did not describe the nature of the defects; notice that frozen bacon was rancid, but which did not specify whether all or only a part of the goods were spoiled; notice that documentation for a printer was missing, where it was ambiguous whether the buyer was referring to the entire printing system or just the printer component of system; notice that sheets of vulcanized rubber for shoe soles had problems or presented defects; notice stating that leather goods did not conform to the buyer's specifications, could not be sold to the buyer's customers, and 250 items were badly stamped; notice that five reels of blankets were missing, but which did not specify the design of the missing blankets and therefore did not permit seller to cure.